![]()
Newsline
Elk Grove, Stockton Pass LawsRestricting ‘Big Box’ Stores
(Back) |
|||
|
Battle vs.
superstores spreads statewide The decision
by a developer to scrap plans to build a Wal-Mart
Supercenter in Concord is only the most recent victory in UFCW 8’s ongoing battle against non-Union
“big box” stores. In August, city councils in
Elk Grove and Stockton voted
to limit construction of
super-sized retail outlets (see
story at right). The
growing trend to limit big box stores began in Turlock and spread to Sacramento,
Elk Grove, Hercules
and other cities. Big-box
battles also have been engaged in Los Angeles,
Ontario, Porterville, Rosemead, Fortuna, Ripon, Antioch, Northridge, Oakland
and the Lugonia District of Redlands. Efforts to impede Wal- Mart’s
invasion of California are having an impact. Of the 40 Supercenters that
Wal-Mart planned to open
in California by 2007, fewer than 10 have been approved. Wal-Mart
recently announced
that it will reduce the number of Supercenter
openings in |
President Jacques
Loveall hailed the passage of
laws in Elk Grove and Stockton that regulate construction
of “big box” stores in
those cities. Elk Grove’s City Council passed its
ordinance on July 11 and Stockton’s followed suit on Aug. 14. UFCW 8 members and allied community groups
played an important role in ensuring the passage of both ordinances. “When Wal-Mart and other predatory companies
are allowed to open gigantic super-stores, good Union jobs are lost and
communities suffer from economic decay, crime and blight,” Loveall
said. “The people of Elk Grove and
Stockton deserve credit for defending their Handbills invited citizens of Elk Grove and
Stockton to City Council meetings where “big box” ordinances
were being considered.
Grove’s ordinance, which passed on a 3-1 vote with Mayor Jim Cooper absent,
bans discount superstores of 150,000 square feet or more that dedicate at
least 10 percent of their floor space to nontaxable items such as groceries. The ordinance also tightens restrictions on big
box stores between 100,000 and 150,000 square feet by requiring reports on
their potential effects on jobs, the city’s net retail sales, crime and urban
decay. The ordinance was passed two years after
residents of Elk Grove’s Sheldon area protested Wal-Mart’s plans to build a
Supercenter there. Wal-Mart eventually withdrew the proposal. |
Working with UFCW 8 were the Elk Grove Community
Connection and the Elk Grove
Coalition Advocating Proper Planning. In Stockton, the City Council voted 6-1 to ban stores that
exceed 100,000 square feet and
contain full-size grocery stores. Councilwoman
Susan Eggman said, “I don’t want
Stockton to be a bigbox city.” Stockton’s ordinance is expected to halt Wal-Mart’s plans to build Supercenter stores in the city’s
Weston Ranch and Spanos Park areas. The
new law also poses problems for a
SuperTarget store that is planned in
northeast Stockton. An already-existing Wal-Mart store at Hammer Lane will not
be affected. President
Loveall noted that Union and community efforts
to oppose Wal- Mart Supercenters are
working. “Wal-Mart
recently announced that it would reduce the
number of Supercenter stores it
plans to open in 2007 by about a
third,” he said. “This is an important strategic
shift for a company that has
pursued aggressive growth for more than
20 years.” Loveall thanked
members of the Union and coalitions
that worked to pass the ordinances. “Everyone who wrote a letter, attended a meeting,
sent an email or took the time to
answer a survey, all made a significant
contribution,” he |
|
|
Judge
Overturns Atwater’s OK of SuperTarget |
|||
|
AMerced County judge struck
down the approval by Atwater city officials of plans to build a giant SuperTarget store. In his June 27 decision, Superior Court
Judge Ronald Hansen ruled that the project’s potential environmental impact
on the community should have been studied more extensively before it was
submitted to Atwater planning officials. “Judge Hansen made the right decision,”
UFCW 8 President Jacques Loveall said. “It was obvious that
the developers were trying to circumvent state environmental laws |
when they concealed
their intention to build a 24-hour SuperTarget store.” “The use of such terms would have
automatically triggered an environmental review of the possible impact the
store would have on existing Atwater businesses,” Loveall said. “Now that an
environmental review is going forward, we will have the time and the platform
we need to uncover the real effects that a SuperTarget store would have on
the Atwater
community.” The judge noted that the developer went
to “great lengths” to avoid using terms such as “super center” and “super
store” when it submitted the proposal to the city. |
||
|
Official publication of UFCW 8-Golden State Jacques
Loveall, President |
|||